Short-term add-on therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker for end-stage inotrope-dependent heart failure patients: B-type natriuretic peptide reduction in a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate angiotensin receptor blocker add-on therapy in patients with low cardiac output during decompensated heart failure. METHODS: We selected patients with decompensated heart failure, low cardiac output, dobutamine dependence, and an ejection fraction <0.45 who were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The patients were randomized to losartan or placebo and underwent invasive hemodynamic and B-type natriuretic peptide measurements at baseline and on the seventh day after intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01857999. RESULTS: We studied 10 patients in the losartan group and 11 patients in the placebo group. The patient characteristics were as follows: age 52.7 years, ejection fraction 21.3%, dobutamine infusion 8.5 mcg/kg.min, indexed systemic vascular resistance 1918.0 dynes.sec/cm5.m2, cardiac index 2.8 L/min.m2, and B-type natriuretic peptide 1,403 pg/mL. After 7 days of intervention, there was a 37.4% reduction in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in the losartan group compared with an 11.9% increase in the placebo group (mean difference, -49.1%; 95% confidence interval: -88.1 to -9.8%, p = 0.018). No significant difference was observed in the hemodynamic measurements. CONCLUSION: Short-term add-on therapy with losartan reduced B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients hospitalized for decompensated severe heart failure and low cardiac output with inotrope dependence. .

Levosimendan in a neonate with severe coarctation of aorta and low cardiac output syndrome.

We report successful use of levosimendan after failed balloon angioplasty in a critically ill neonate with coarctation of aorta (CoA) and severe low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Treatment with levosimendan improved left heart function, and decreased lactate and brain natriuretic peptide levels. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the safe and successful use of levosimendan in the management of LCOS due to severe CoA in a neonate awaiting surgical repair.

É necessário suspender o betabloqueador na insuficiência cardíaca descompensada com baixo débito? / Is it necessary to suspend betablockers in decompensated heart failure with low output? / ¿Es necesario suspender el betabloqueante en la insuficiencia cardíaca descompensada con bajo débito?

FUNDAMENTO: Há evidências de que a suspensão do betabloqueador (BB) na descompensação cardíaca pode aumentar mortalidade. A dobutamina (dobuta) é o inotrópico mais utilizado na descompensação, no entanto, BB e dobuta atuam no mesmo receptor com ações antagônicas, e o uso concomitante dos dois fármacos poderia dificultar a compensação. OBJETIVO: Avaliar se a manutenção do BB associado à dobuta dificulta a compensação cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Estudados 44 pacientes com FEVE < 45 por cento e necessidade de inotrópico. Divididos em três grupos de acordo com o uso de BB. Grupo A (n=8): os que não usavam BB na admissão; Grupo B (n=25): os que usavam BB, porém foi suspenso para iniciar a dobuta; Grupo C (n=11): os que usaram BB concomitante à dobuta. Para comparação dos grupos, foram utilizados os testes t de Student, exato de Fisher e qui-quadrado. Considerado significante p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: FEVE média de 23,8 ± 6,6 por cento. O tempo médio do uso de dobuta foi semelhante nos três grupos (p=0,35), e o uso concomitante da dobuta com o BB não aumentou o tempo de internação (com BB 20,36 ± 11,04 dias vs sem BB 28,37 ± 12,76 dias, p=NS). Na alta, a dose do BB foi superior nos pacientes em que a medicação não foi suspensa (35,8 ± 16,8 mg/dia vs 23,0 ± 16,7 mg/dia, p=0,004). CONCLUSÃO: A manutenção do BB associado à dobuta não aumentou o tempo de internação e não foi acompanhada de pior evolução. Os pacientes que não suspenderam o BB tiveram alta com doses mais elevadas do medicamento.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that the suspension of betablockers (BB) in decompensated heart failure may increase mortality. Dobutamine (dobuta) is the most commonly used inotrope in decompensation, however, BB and dobuta act with the same receptor with antagonist actions, and concurrent use of both drugs could hinder compensation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the maintenance of BB associated with dobuta difficults cardiac compensation. METHODS: We studied 44 patients with LVEF < 45 percent and the need for inotropics. Divided into three groups according to the use of BB. Group A (n=8): those who were not using BB at baseline; Group B (n=25): those who used BB, but was suspended to start dobuta; Group C (n = 11): those who used BB concomitant to dobuta. To compare groups, we used the Student t, Fisher exact and chi-square tests. Considered significant if p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean LVEF 23.8 ± 6.6 percent. The average use of dobuta use was similar in all groups (p = 0.35), and concomitant use of dobutamine with BB did not increase the length of stay (BB 20.36 ± 11.04 days vs without BB 28.37 ± 12.76 days, p = NS). In the high dose, BB was higher in patients whose medication was not suspended (35.8 ± 16.8 mg/day vs 23.0 ± 16.7 mg/day, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Maintaining BB associated with dobutamine did not increase the length of hospitalization and was not associated with the worst outcome. Patients who did not suspend BB were discharged with higher doses of the drug.

FUNDAMENTO: Hay evidencias de que la suspensión del betabloqueante (BB) en la descompensación cardíaca puede aumentar la mortalidad. La dobutamina (dobuta) es el inotrópico más utilizado en la descompensación, mientras tanto, BB y dobuta actúan en el mismo receptor con acciones antagónicas, y el uso concomitante de los dos fármacos podría dificultar la compensación. OBJETIVO: Evaluar si la manutención del BB asociado a la dobuta dificulta la compensación cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Estudiados 44 pacientes con FEVI < 45 por ciento y necesidad de inotrópico. Divididos en tres grupos de acuerdo con el uso de BB. Grupo A (n=8): los que no usaban BB en la admisión; Grupo B (n=25): los que usaban BB, sin embargo fue suspendido para iniciar la dobuta; Grupo C (n=11): los que usaron BB concomitantemente a la dobuta. Para comparación de los grupos, fueron utilizados los test t de Student, exacto de Fisher y qui-cuadrado. Considerado significante P < 0,05. RESULTADOS: FEVI media de 23,8±6,6 por ciento. El tiempo medio de uso de dobuta fue semejante en los tres grupos (p=0,35), y el uso concomitante de la dobuta con el BB no aumentó el tiempo de internación (con BB 20,36 ± 11,04 días vs sin BB 28,37 ± 12,76 días, p=NS). En el alta, la dosis del BB fue superior en los pacientes en que la medicación no fue suspendida (35,8 ± 16,8 mg/día vs 23,0 ± 16,7 mg/día, p=0,004). CONCLUSIÓN: La manutención del BB asociado a la dobuta no aumentó el tiempo de internación y no fue acompañada de peor evolución. Los pacientes que no suspendieron el BB tuvieron alta con dosis más elevadas del medicamento.

Adição de Bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina II na insuficiência cardíaca descompensada / Adición de bloqueante del receptor de angiotensina II en la insuficiencia cardiaca descompensada / Angiotensin II receptor blocker add-on therapy for low cardiac output in decompensated heart failure

FUNDAMENTO: Durante a descompensação da insuficiência cardíaca, ocorre uma intensa ativação do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona, entretanto, o uso de inibidor da enzima de conversão de angiotensina (IECA) não pode bloqueá-lo completamente. De outro modo, a adição de bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina II (BRA) pode ser útil quando ocorre a dependência de inotrópico. Avaliamos a eficiência da associação BRA-IECA para retirada da dobutamina na insuficiência cardíaca avançada e descompensada. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da associação de bloqueador do receptor AT1 de angiotensina II ao inibidor de enzima de conversão, para a retirada da dobutamina em pacientes com dependência de suporte inotrópico decorrente da descompensação aguda da insuficiência cardíaca crônica. MÉTODOS: Em um estudo caso-controle (N = 24), selecionamos pacientes internados por descompensação da insuficiência cardíaca e com uso por mais de 15 dias de dobutamina, ou uma ou mais tentativas sem sucesso de retirada; dose otimizada de IECA; e FEVE < 0,45. Os pacientes então receberam adicionalmente BRA (n = 12) ou não (controle, n = 12). O desfecho foi o sucesso na retirada da dobutamina, avaliado pela regressão logística, com p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: A fração de ejeção foi de 0,25, e a idade de 53 anos, com dose de dobutamina de 10,7 μg/kg.min. O sucesso na retirada de dobutamina ocorreu em oito pacientes do grupo BRA (67,7 por cento), e em dois no grupo controle (16,7 por cento). A "odds ratio" foi de 10,0 (intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento:1,4 a 69,3; p = 0,02). A piora da função renal foi semelhante (grupo BRA: 42 por cento vs. grupo controle: 67 por cento, p = 0,129). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo piloto, a associação BRA-IECA foi relacionada ao sucesso na retirada da dobutamina, na insuficiência cardíaca avançada descompesada. A piora da função renal foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. Estudos adicionais são necessários para esclarecer o assunto.

BACKGROUND: During heart failure (HF) decompensation, an intense activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system occurs; however, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) cannot block it completely. Otherwise, the addition of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) can be useful when the inotropic dependence occurs. We evaluated the efficacy of the ARB-ACEI association on dobutamine withdrawal in advanced decompensated HF. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of association angiotensin receptor blocker - angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor to withdraw the intravenous inotropic support in decompensated severe heart failure. METHODS: In a case-control study (N = 24), we selected patients admitted at the hospital due to HF that had been using dobutamine for more than 15 days, with one or more unsuccessful drug withdrawal attempts; optimized dose of ACEI and ejection fraction (EF) < 0.45. Then, the patients additionally received ARB (n=12) or not (control, n=12). The outcome was the successful dobutamine withdrawal, evaluated by logistic regression, with a p < 0.05. RESULTS: The EF was 0.25 and the age was 53 years, with a dobutamine dose of 10.7 μg/kg.min. The successful drug withdrawal was observed in 8 patients from the ARB group (67.7 percent) and in 2 patients from the control group (16.7 percent). The odds ratio (OR) was 10.0 (95 percentCI: 1.4 to 69.3; p = 0.02). The worsening in renal function was similar (ARB group: 42 percent vs. control group: 67 percent; p=0.129). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, the ARB-ACEI association was associated with successful dobutamine withdrawal in advanced decompensated heart failure. The worsening in renal function was similar in both groups. Further studies are necessary to clarify the issue.

FUNDAMENTO: Durante la descompensación de la insuficiencia cardiaca, ocurre una intensa activación del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona, sin embargo, el empleo de inhibidor de la enzima de conversión de angiotensina (IECA) no puede bloquearlo completamente. De otro modo, la adición de bloqueante del receptor de angiotensina II (BRA) puede ser útil cuando ocurre la dependencia de inotrópico. Evaluamos la eficiencia de la asociación BRA-IECA para retirada de la dobutamina en la insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada y descompensada. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia de la asociación de bloqueante del receptor AT1 de angiotensina II al inhibidor de enzima de conversión, para la retirada de la dobutamina en pacientes con dependencia de soporte inotrópico que trascurre de la descompensación aguda de la insuficiencia cardiaca crónica. MÉTODOS: En un estudio caso-control (N = 24), seleccionamos a pacientes internados por descompensación de la insuficiencia cardiaca y con empleo por más de 15 días de dobutamina, o una o más intentos sin éxito de retirada; dosis optimizada de IECA; y FEVI < 0,45. Así que los pacientes recibieron adicionalmente BRA (n = 12) o no (control, n = 12). El desenlace fue el éxito en la retirada de la dobutamina, evaluado por la regresión logística, con p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: La fracción de eyección fue de 0,25, y la edad de 53 años, con dosis de dobutamina de 10,7 μg/kg.min. El éxito en la retirada de dobutamina ocurrió en ocho pacientes del grupo BRA (67,7 por ciento), y en dos en el grupo control (16,7 por ciento). La "odds ratio" fue de 10,0 (intervalo de confianza de 95 por ciento:1,4 a 69,3; p = 0,02). El empeoramiento de la función renal se halló similar (grupo BRA: 42 por ciento vs grupo control: 67 por ciento, p = 0,129). CONCLUSIÓN: En este estudio piloto, la asociación BRA-IECA se relacionó al éxito en la retirada de la dobutamina, en la insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada descompensada. El empeoramiento de la función ...

Pharmacological management of low cardiac output syndrome after cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery

Low cardiac output syndrome is a pathophysiological state in which the cardiac output is not sufficient to maintain blood flow to meet the metabolic needs of the body. After coronary artery bypass surgery, therapeutic intervention of low cardiac output syndrome should ideally provide positive inotropy without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption, after load reduction, antiarrhythmic activity and selective renal vasodilatation. Therefore this study was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of adrenaline/tridil with dopamine and dobutamine in the treatment of low cardiac output syndrome after weaning from extracorporeal circulation, Thirty patients, scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery, were enrolled. Usual hemodynamic monitoring was carried out using arterial and percutaneous heparin coated multiflex thermodilution catheter. Immediately after separation from CPB, and after confirmation of low cardiac output syndrome, patients [10/group] were randomized to receive one of the following inotropes: dopamine 2 micro g/kg/min [Dopamine group], or dobutamine 5 micro g/kg/min [Dobutamine group], or adrenaline 0.1 micro g/kg/min/tridil 0.5-1 micro g/kg/min [adrenaline/tridil group]. The dose of the drug was titrated in order to attain a CI>3L min/m[2]. The following baseline hemodynamic variables and derived hemodynamic indices were taken: HR, MAP, CVP, PCWP, CI, SVI, SVRI and PVRL These variables were measured prior to the drug administration [TI], 30 minutes [T2], I-[T3], 3-[T4], 6-[15], 12-[T6], and 24-[T7] hours after initiation of the drug administration. There were no significant differences in the operative procedures or hemodynamics at entry into the study [T1]. Infusion of dobutamine or adrenaline tridil resulted in a significant increase of HR, MAP, CL and SVI. associated with reduction of CVP and PCWP compared to baseline values at all assessment times. On the other hand, infusion of dopamine increased HR, MAP, and SVL but did not affect CVP. Compared to the baseline values, both SVRI and PVRI values were significantly increased after dopamine, decreased after adrenaline/tridil whereas dobutamine did not affect both variables. Immediately after CPB [TI], mean CI values were less than 2L/min/m[2] [1.54, 1.57 and 1.66 L/min/m[2] at TI, for dopamine, dobutamine and groups; respectively]. At the end of the study time [17], mean CI values were 2.95, 3.08 and 3.22 L/min/m[2]. During the entire study period, no adrenaline/tridil between-group differences in HR, CI or SVI were found. Compared to other groups, significant increases in MAP, PCWP, SVRI and PVRI were noticed in dopamine group, whereas CP was significantly lower in the adrenaline/tridil group. Although the mean 24-hrs volumes of fluids given to the patients were comparable, the mean 24-hrs mm volume was significantly higher in the adrenaline/tridil group than in dopamine and dobutamine groups. None of patients receiving adrenaline/tridil developed PVC's or ST-segment depression in contrast to the other 2 groups. Administration of adrenaline/tridil to patients with low cardiac output syndrome following cardiac surgery proved an effective way to stabilize the circulation in the immediate postoperative period. The combination of adrenergic activity and vasodilator activity, could give adrenaline/tridil favorable and unique application

Efeitos do tartarato de metoprolol em pacientes portadores de insuficiência cardíaca / Effects of metoprolol tartrate therapy in patients with heart failure / Effects of metoprolol tartrate therapy in patients with heart failure

OBJETIVO: Estudar os efeitos do tartarato de metoprolol em pacientes portadores de insuficiência cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados em estudo prospectivo, 50 pacientes (36 homens) com insuficiência cardíaca, classe funcional II a IV, com 52±14,8 anos, e fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) < 45 por cento avaliada pela ventriculografia radioisotópica. Foi adicionado tartarato metoprolol à terapêutica habitual. Iniciado 12,5 mg e aumentado semanalmente até atingir 200 mg/dia, conforme tolerância. Realizaram-se avaliação clinica, eletrocardiograma, ecodopplercardiograma, holter 24 horas e ventriculografia radiosotópica na fase pré-tratamento, e repetidos após três e seis meses em uso da medicação. RESULTADOS: Ao final de seis meses, houve melhora da classe funcional (NYHA) com redução de 3,04±0,11 para 1,66±0,06(p<0,001). A fração de ejeção aumentou de 29,84+1,61 por cento para 38,56±1,95 por cento (p< 0,001). O diâmetro diastólico ventricular esquerdo apresentou redução de 67,70±1,31 mm para 63,96±1,29 mm (p<0,001), e o diâmetro sistólico ventricular esquerdo apresentou redução de 54,80±1,67 mm para 48,58±1,38 (p<0,001). Não houve variação dos níveis de noradrenalina no seguimento de seis meses (p>0,05). A freqüência cardíaca apresentou redução de 78,84±batimentos por minuto para 67,48±1,86 batimentos por minuto (p<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A utilização do tartarato de metoprolol adicionado à terapêutica habitual da insuficiência cardíaca é acompanhada por aumento da fração de ejeção, melhora da classe funcional, diminuição dos diâmetros ventriculares e pela diminuição da freqüência cardíaca. Estes resultados sugerem efeitos anti-remodelamento em pacientes portadores de IC, com o uso de tartarato de metoprolol.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of metoprolol tartrate therapy in patients with heart failure. METHODS: Fifty patients (36 males) aged 52±14.8 yrs, with functional class II to IV heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVFE) < 45 percent, assessed by radionuclide ventriculography, were evaluated in a retrospective study. Metoprolol tartrate was added to the usual therapy, with a starting dose of 12.5 mg, which was increased weekly to a maximum of 200 mg/day, according to patientsÆ tolerance. Clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, Doppler echocardiogram, 24-h Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography were carried out in the pre-treatment phase and repeated three and six months after the start of therapy. RESULTS: At the end of six months, there was functional class (NYHA) improvement with a reduction from 3.04±0.11 to 1.66±0.06(p<0.001). Ejection fraction increased from 29.84+1.61 percent to 38.56±1.95 percent (p< 0.001). The left ventricular diastolic diameter showed a reduction from 67.70±1.31 mm to 63.96±1.29 mm (p<0.001), and the left ventricular systolic diameter showed a reduction from 54.80±1.67 mm to 48.58±1.38 (p<0.001). There was no alteration in noradrenaline levels during the six-month follow-up period (p>0.05). Cardiac frequency decreased from 78.84±1.68 to 67.48±1.86 b.p.m. (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The adding of metoprolol tartrate to the usual heart failure therapy is followed by an increase of ejection fraction, functional class improvement, and decrease of ventricular diameters and cardiac frequency. These results suggest anti-remodeling effects in patients with HF who utilize metoprolol tartrate in addition to the usual therapy.

Percepções sobre diagnóstico e manuseio da insuficiência cardíaca: comparação entre cardiologistas clínicos e médicos de família / Perceptions of heart failure diagnosis and management: comparison between clinical cardiologists and family doctors

OBJETIVO: Comparar as percepções sobre diagnóstico e manuseio da insuficiência cardíaca (IC) entre cardiologistas clínicos (CC) e médicos de família (MF) de Niterói. MÉTODOS: Utilização de questionário qualitativo validado no estudo EURO-HF, que foi submetido a 54 MF e 62 CC. Esses profissionais forneceram informações sobre a forma de diagnóstico da IC, acesso aos exames complementares e quais são mais utilizados; nome dos medicamentos utilizados, doses, efeitos adversos e quais fármacos reduzem mortalidade. RESULTADOS: MF e CC relataram como os sinais e sintomas mais freqüentemente identificados nos pacientes com IC dispnéia, edema e cansaço (96,3 por cento vs 100 por cento, 74 por cento vs 58 por cento e 22,2 por cento vs 67,7 por cento). A classificação de severidade de IC mais utilizada pelos MF foi leve/moderada/grave (53,8 por cento) e pelos CC foi da NYHA (72,7 por cento). CC solicitam ecocardiograma com maior freqüência que os MF (p < 0,001). CC diferenciam IC com função sistólica preservada da IC com disfunção sistólica mais freqüentemente que os MF (p < 0,001). CC usam mais freqüentemente betabloqueadores (p < 0,001), IECA (p < 0,001) e espironolactona (p < 0,001) que MF. As doses de IECA utilizadas pelos CC são maiores que as usadas pelos MF (p < 0,001) e as doses de espironolactona mais próximas às recomendadas na literatura. CONCLUSÃO: CC utilizam uma investigação diagnóstica mais intensa, bem como utilizam os fármacos que reduzem a morbidade e mortalidade dos pacientes com IC com maior propriedade.

Uso de levosimendan en enfermos con falla cardíaca aguda / Levosimendan in patients with acute cardiac failure

Objetivo: Valorar el uso de levosimendan en el contexto de la falla cardíaca aguda. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes que ingresaron o desarrollaron insuficiencia cardíaca aguda, con respuesta parcial al manejo habitual definida como la presencia de bajo gasto cardíaco a pesar de tratamiento inotrópico. Se inició levosimendan administrando una dosis de carga y se continuó con una infusión durante 24 horas, monitorizándose a los pacientes con un catéter de flotación pulmonar y registrándose los parámetros hemodinámicos, así como las variables clínicas de frecuencia cardíaca (FC) y presión arterial media (PAM). Resultados: Observamos mejoría clínica en todos los pacientes. Hemodinámicamente se documentó disminución de la presión capilar pulmonar (PCP) de 18 cmH2O (11-30 cmH2O) a 14 cmH2O (8-15 cmH2O) (p = 0.3) para las 12 horas de haberse iniciado la infusión y al final de 13 cmH2O (8-12 cmH2O) (p = 0.2.) Igualmente se observó mejoría en cuanto al índice cardíaco (IC) 2.1 L/min/m² (1.8-3.5 L/min/m²), a 2.86 L/min/m² (2-4.3 L/min/m²) (p = 0.03) a las 12 h de la infusión y manteniéndose de 3.08 L/min/m² (2.4-3.9 L/min/m²) al término de la infusión (p = 0.02.). Sólo 6 pacientes mostraron como complicación taquicardia con FC mayor de 120 x min, que fue transitoria y que no requirió manejo adicional. En ningún caso requirió iniciar infusión de algún vasopresor. La mortalidad hasta el momento es de 8 pacientes. Conclusión: El uso de levosimendan en pacientes con falla cardíaca aguda mejora las variables hemodinámicas y clínicas con pocos efectos adversos en esta población de estudio.

Objective: To assess levosimendan efficacy in acute cardiac failure. Methods: We included 25 patients with acute cardiac failure and partial conventional therapy response defined as persistence of low cardiac output with inotropic support. We started levosimendan at loading dose and continuous infusion for 24 hours, recording hemodynamic data, as well as clinical variables. Results: All patients showed clinical and hemodynamic improvement. Pulmonary wedge capillary pressure (PWCP) decreased from 18 cmH2O (11 -30 cmH2O) to 14 cmH2O (8-15 cmH2O) at 12 hours (p = 0.3) and to 13 cmH2O (8-12 cmH2O) at the end of the infusion period (p = 0.2). Cardiac index increased from 2.1 L/min/m² (1.8-3.5 L/ min/m²) to 2.86 L/min/m² (2-4.3 L/min/m²) at 12 hours (p = 0.03) and to 3.08 L/min/m² at the end of the infusion period (p = 0.02). Tachycardia higherthan 120 bpm was present in six patients. No major hypotensive events were present. Mortality to the present is of eight patients. Conclusion: Levosimendan infusion improved hemodynamics and clinical variables in acute cardiac failure with few side effects in this small series of patients.

Edema generalizado e circulação hiperdinâmica: um possível caso de beribéri / Generalized edema and hyperdynamic circulation: a possible case of beriberi

Paciente com insuficiência cardíaca causada pelo beribéri, apresentando regressão dos sinais e sintomas adquiridos após medicação com tiamina.

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the management of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass surgery

To assess the efficacy of pharmacological management as compared to early and primary institution of Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the management of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery surgery. Postoperative Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care cardiac hospital. It is a retrospective study of 124 patients who developed post operative low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass surgery. These patients were treated either with multiple inotropes, plus vasodilators [GP-I, n = 65] or with single inotrope and IABP support within 02 hours after hemodynamic compromise [GP-II, n = 59]. Different hemodynamic variables were compared among both the groups by Statistical Package for Social Sciences [SPSS] Outcome studied: Mean arterial pressure [MAP], Cardiac index [CI], Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP], Central venous pressure [CVP], Urine output and ICU stay were compared. Overall survival in both the groups was also noted. Both groups showed improvement in CI, MAP, Urine output, CVP and PCWP, however the improvement was more pronounced in GP-II which was statistically significant after 24 hours. Mean duration of IABP support and stay in ICU was less in GP-II. Survival in GP-I was 24/65 [36.9%] as compared to 34/59 [57.6%] in GP-II. Early initiation of IABP support results in better hemodynamic profile, reduced mortality, reduced ICU stay in patients developing low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass surgery as compared to pure pharmacologic support or late addition of mechanical support

Cardiologistas de um hospital escola adotam as diretrizes para o tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca? / Do cardiologists at a university hospital adopt the guidelines for the treatment of heart failure?

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the guidelines for the treatment of heart failure have been adopted at a university hospital. The guidelines recommend the following: use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for all patients with systolic ventricular dysfunction, use of digitalis and diuretics for symptomatic patients, use of beta-blockers for patients in functional classes II or III, use of spironolactone for patients in functional classes III or IV. METHODS: We analyzed the prescriptions of 199 patients. All these patients had ejection fraction (EF) <=0.50, their ages ranged from 25 to 86 years, and 142 were males. Cardiomyopathy was the most frequent diagnosis: 67 (33.6 percent) patients had dilated cardiomyopathy, 65 (32.6 percent) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed for 93 percent of the patients. 71.8 percent also had a prescription for digitalis, 86.9 percent for diuretics, 27.6 percent for spironolactone, 12 percent for beta-blockers, 37.2 percent for acetylsalicylic acid, 6.5 percent for calcium channel antagonists, and 12.5 percent for anticoagulants. In regard to vasodilators, 71 percent of the patients were using captopril (85.2mg/day), 20 percent enalapril (21.4mg/day), 3 percent hydralazine and nitrates. In 71.8 percent of the cases, the dosages prescribed were in accordance with those recommended in the large studies. CONCLUSION: Most patients were prescribed the same doses as those recommended in the large studies. Brazilian patients tolerate well the doses recommended in the studies, and that not using these doses may be a consequence of the physician's fear of prescribing them and not of the patient's intolerance

Bloqueadores beta-adrenérgicos na insuficiência cardíaca / Beta-adrenergic blocking agents in heart failure

Cardiac dysfunction in heart failure is widely recognized as a progressive process, regardless of the clinical signs and symptoms. An increase in cardiac sympathetic drive is one of the earliest neurohormonal responses occurring in patients with heart failure and may be one of the major causes of the progressive remodeling leading to the decline in myocardial function, and responsible for the poor prognosis of patients with heart failure. Therefore, recent data provided by several appropriately designed clinical trials clearly indicate the benefits of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, combined with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and digoxin in chronic heart failure class II to IV due to systolic ventricular dysfunction. The benefits are related to symptoms, functional capacity, remodeling, and improvement in left ventricular function, reduction in cardiovascular hospitalization, a decrease in the overall and sudden cardiac death rate, and are similar in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, independent of age, gender, or functional class. In this review we describe the cardiovascular effects of the increase in sympathetic drive, the pharmacological properties of the beta-blockers most evaluated in heart failure therapy (metoprolol, bisoprolol, and carvedilol), the major clinical trials related to these agents in heart failure, the recommendations for their appropriate use in clinical practice, the precautions to be adopted, and how to handle the more common adverse reactions

Efeito do carvedilol na insuficiência cardíaca por cardiomiopatia dilatada: resultado de estudo duplo-cego, randômico, com grupo placebo-controle (estudo CARIBE) / Effects of carvedilol in heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy: results of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study (CARIBE study)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of carvedilol in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, 30 patients (7 women) with functional class II and III heart failure were assessed. Their ages ranged from 28 to 66 years (mean of 43ñ9 years), and their left ventricular ejection fraction varied from 8 per cnet to 35 per cent. Carvedilol was added to the usual therapy of 20 patients; placebo was added to the usual therapy of 10 patients. The initial dose of carvedilol was 12.5 mg, which was increased weekly until it reached 75 mg/day, according to the patient's tolerance. Clinical assessment, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and radionuclide ventriculography were performed in the pretreatment phase, being repeated after 2 and 6 months of medication use. RESULTS: A reduction in heart rate (p=0.016) as well as an increase in left ventricular shortening fraction (p=0.02) and in left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.017) occurred in the group using carvedilol as compared with that using placebo. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol added to the usual therapy for heart failure resulted in better heart function.

Insuficiência cardíaca crônica e óxido nítrico / Chronic heart failure and nitric oxide

O presente tabalho tem por objetivo realizar um levantamento do papel do óxido nítrico (NO) e de seu precursor L-arginina no contexto da síndrome de insuficiência cardíaca crônica